Panda Express – Not Vegetarian

The below piece is from the Vegetarian Resource Group (VRG) email news letter
http://www.vrg.org/vrgnews/index.htm

————————–

PANDA EXPRESS – NOT VEGETARIAN
from: VRG-NEWS, The Vegetarian Resource Group Newsletter
Editors: Sonja Y. Helman & John L. Cunningham
December 2006

Most of you have probably eaten at or at least seen the popular
quick-service Chinese restaurant, Panda Express. It is common to find them at airports and food courts. You may not be aware that with the exception of the steamed rice, their food is not vegetarian. Their website unequivocally states “we do not offer vegetarian meals.” Their food is prepared with a chicken base. For more information, you can go to their nutrition page on the web

http://www.pandaexpress.com/menu/nutrition.aspx

They responded to our email saying, “Although some of our stores are transitioning to using a vegetable broth we still do not offer vegetarian entrees.” If you would like to offer positive comments to Panda Express regarding your desire that all their restaurants use vegetable broth, you can contact them through their website

http://www.pandaexpress.com

Don’t Get A Rabbit

Don’t get a rabbit as a pet…..that is unless you have read up on what is involved with properly taking care of a rabbit and you have no problem with doing those things.

Rabbits can live up to 14 years, but many domesticated rabbits only live about 1 – 2 years. Yes, you read that correctly. Many rabbits purchased as pets are also abandoned. Domesticated rabbits do not have the ability to fend for themselves the way a wild rabbit would. Why are these things happening?

These things are happening because many people think of rabbits as being low maintenance pets.

The exact opposite is true.

Rabbits have many needs. Care needs to be taken with their diets and with the materials they are exposed to. They need to be able to roam. They tend not to respond to people like a cat or a dog would. They can damage furniture. They leave “things” around the house.

I am not trying to discourage anyone from getting a rabbit as a pet. For their own benefit and of kindness to the animal they should be made aware of what owning a rabbit entails.

Change The Adjectives

I recently got finished reading the book “Oryx and Crake” by Margaret Atwood.

Atwood is a feminist novelist who makes occasional and GOOD forays into science fiction. Though her stories are not innovative for the science fiction genre she writes well, and infuses new life into old stories.

In Atwood’s book the main character studies literature while he is in school. He develops an interest in reading very old self help books. When he graduates he ends up getting a job as a promotions person for a company that makes self improvement products. I found this quote from the job interview scene to be provocative:

(approximately page 245, the chapter titled “Vulturing”)

What had impressed them, said the interviewers — there were two of them, a woman and a man — was his senior dissertation on self-help books of the twentieth century. One of their core products, they told him, were the improvement items — not books any more, of course, but the DVDs, the CD-ROMs, the Web sites, and so forth.

(page 246 )

“You showed great insight into the process”, the woman said. “In your dissertation. We found it very mature.”

“If you know one century, you know them all,” said the man.

“But the adjectives change”, said Jimmy. “Nothing’s worse than last year’s adjectives”

“Exactly!” said the man, as if Jimmy had just solved the riddle of the universe in one blinding flashbulb of light.

I have some time management and self improvement books on my book shelf that have really been valuable in my life. I’ve noticed that new books on these subjects come out in regular cycles, but they rarely ever say anything new and sometimes they say the same old thing not as well as earlier books.

Like Atwood’s quote it seems that all these authors do is make new buzz terms and rearrange the content without adding any value. Yes, some of them do add insights or make old content more accessible to contemporary audiences. Beyond this there are two reason I think that drive the perpetual recycling of the self help books:

1. It is hard to make money republishing or using existing works.

2. The consumer wants to believe there is something new and publishers are willing to exploit this.

In regards to one of the things I liked about Stephen Covey’s “7 Habits Of Highly Effective People” is his observation that successful people do things of value, even when they do not feel like it. Covey went on to say that no matter the system, if you want to be successful at your goals sooner or later it will always come back to having to do that.

Having read book reviews of various self help books on Amazon I think people who go self-help book hopping are looking for a way around having to do things when they do not feel like doing them. They are looking for some magical system that will make them always feel enthused about doing what they think they should be doing. When a new book, with the same content, but “new adjectives” comes out it gives them the illusion of a new system that might have away around having to do things without feeling like doing them.