Blessings And Burdens In Longevity

Larry Haubner just had his 107th birthday. I initially found this article depressing. Haubner never had a family, is penniless having outlived his savings and he finds himself living in 2009 — a world that has few familiar surroundings in common with the world of his birth in 1902.

On the other hand, people who live in nursing homes rarely have their children visit them, maybe a few times a year. What is new and strange also becomes familiar.

I saw an old 70s style phone the other day and though I felt a bit of nostalgia I couldn’t imagine using such a phone anymore.

Larry Haubner lived on his own, taking care of himself until he was 102 and to this day he doesn’t take any medication. He was able to do those things because he has been a nutrition and exercise buff. Neighbors frequently saw him riding his bike down to the local river to sit by it and sing. Riding a bike at nearly one century of age and still enjoying life enough to sing. Haubner isn’t a sad man.

The staff at his assisted living facility have made successful web sites and pledge drives on his behalf to raise money for his living expenses. Haubner may not have a family, but he isn’t alone or friendless at his age.

To a younger person his situation may look grim, but Haubner is happy

The article from the Washington Post

Less food in our food

picture of bread in a wheat field

A recent article at Mother Earth News stated that plant breeders have caused the amount of nutrition in our food to decrease:

  • Wheat and barley: protein concentrations declined by 30 to 50 percent between the years 1938 and 1990.
  • In 45 corn varieties developed from 1920 to 2001, concentrations of protein, oil and three amino acids have all declined in the newer varieties.
  • Six minerals have declined by 22 to 39 percent in 14 widely grown wheat varieties developed over the past 100 years.
  • Average calcium content of broccoli was 12.9 milligrams per gram of dry weight in 1950; 4.4 mg/g dry weight in 2003

Fertilizer and organics aside, the breeds developed for better yields are also causing problems.

Why I Take Animal-Tested Drugs

Why I Take Animal-Tested Drugs
Simon Chaitowitz
Posted March 4, 2009 | 01:51 PM (EST)

One of my doctors has told me to get my affairs in order, which is why I’m writing this column. I want to explain why someone who takes so many animal-tested drugs is opposed to animal research.

I have full-blown leukemia and the chemotherapy I’m taking doesn’t seem to be working all that well.

snip ….

Throughout the past six years, I have felt terribly guilty about the drugs and procedures I’ve undergone because I know that so many animals have suffered in their development. I know about these conditions because of my former job — working for a nonprofit that promotes alternatives to animal research. I know about the conditions from talking with former animal researchers and others who have witnessed the cruelty. In fact, one man I know from an Internet support group remembers hearing lab dogs yelping in pain at the hospital where we both had our transplants.

snip ….

But as someone who recently signed up for hospice, I have another major problem with animal research. I wonder if science would have found a cure for my leukemia by now if they weren’t sidetracked by misleading animal tests.

snip ….

More than 90 percent of all new drugs which proved effective in animals end up not working for humans. It’s because animals — however similar they are to us — have different physiological systems. What works in a mouse usually doesn’t work in a human.

History is filled with stories of drugs that didn’t work in animals — Aspirin, for example — that ended up working in humans. And the obituary pages are filled with stories of people who died from drugs that looked safe in animals. The painkiller Vioxx, for example, tested safe in mice and five other species but ended up killing many thousands of Americans.

snip ….

If the chemo drugs I’m trying now don’t work, I do have one last option. I could try a Phase One trial. That’s when a drug looks promising in animals and is first tested in humans. My doctor started to tell me why so many participants die in Phase One trials — but it turned out I already knew the answer. Drugs that work in animals, he explained, usually don’t work in humans.

Full Article