Tag: Old Age

92 Year Old Has Done Yoga Her Whole Life

Porchon Lynch, became interested in yoga as a child when girls weren’t supposed to do it. She has been teaching yoga for 42 years and at 92 years of age is still teaching. Watching this video it is easy to forget she is 92. She still has all of her faculties and is even doing difficult yoga postures. Inspiring!

I’ve been seeing a lot of videos of 70 something weightlifting enthusiasts still going strong. I wrote that off as being a gift resulting from devoting yourself toward being a gym rat.   However, I remember from my own yoga practice that I could easily spend several hours a day doing yoga and that I could also hurt myself doing yoga. So, perhaps being a regular weightlifter isn’t anymore of an impingement upon a working person’s life than yoga.

Wow, still, 92 and being that functional, as well as still being able to do something physical she loves.  Inspiring!

Old brains, better brains?

I haven’t read this book yet, but I plan to. Even the book review for it reposted below is fascinating. Older brains are better brains? Keeping with the theme of reality contradicting stereotypes about age also see this earlier post:

Hope I die before I get old

======================================

This book review is from:

http://metapsychology.mentalhelp.net

The Mature Mind
The Positive Power of the Aging Brain
by Gene D. Cohen
Basic Books, 2005
Review by David M. Wolf, M.A. on Feb 20th 2007
Volume: 11, Number: 8

In this readable, concise report of his own and relevant research into the aging brain, Dr. Cohen delivers a real basis for hope. We’re not just getting older; we’re getting better. Maybe. And here’s the point: we can mature and get better if we do the right things and participate in the right things. This book fully describes what activities, changes, or interventions are useful and beneficial. Cohen uses scientific studies and case examples to make the facts plain. Everyone over forty should read this book, because its findings will directly influence career moves and lifestyle choices.

Cognition, creativity, intelligence, and, especially, memory (or its impairment) are of vital concern to most people as they age. The Mature Mind inquires into the brain’s changes as we age and relates these to how the human mind manages in the face of the brain’s changes. Our job as educated people is to learn what is happening and make the adjustments and commitments that lead toward a vigorous maturity.

The brain, Cohen reports, is not just losing neurons and getting old; the brain is also developing, growing new neural networks and cells, and becoming more balanced between its two hemispheres. The worst “rubbish” from the past, according to Cohen, is in the false phrase, “You can’t teach an old dog new tricks.” The essence of successful maturity is to continue learning, growing, challenging the brain and the whole human being as it ages. Doing this with wisdom, creativity, social support and attention to everyone’s need for a sense of control and mastery is the right approach to successful aging.

Cohen’s axiom for what drives and sustains us throughout life he names “Inner Push.” As he uses this insight, it appears synonymous with the philosopher Spinoza’s idea of the “fiery Conatus”, and also, quite like Henri Bergson’s more poetic idea of the elan vital. Inner Push is there while we breathe, and it’s up to us to shape its energies.

We do this in the second half of life according to Four Phases, says Cohen: Midlife Reevaluation (ages 40-65), Liberation phase (50s through 70s), Summing Up (late 60s through 70s-80s), and Encore phase, until the end of life. The Mature Mind is largely a characterization and description of these phases, plus some helpful essays on creativity in old age and lists of resources. Cohen also spends some ink debunking “midlife crisis”, which he says is a myth.

The “power” and “potential” of older minds is rooted in a human brain that not only ages, but also, develops over time. We may individually be surprised by age, but the biological brain is not: the program includes adaptive responses in which the brain can adjust and rewire itself. This physiological change can be far greater than people ordinarily suppose if the aging adult remains active mentally, accepts challenges individually and socially, and gets some regular exercise.

In other words, the hopeful result depends in large part on how much the brain is stimulated with learning and activity of the kind that promotes vitality. Depend on TV, let your friends die off, become isolated and alone, retire, become or remain inactive physically: these are the old habits that lead to degeneration and death. However, exercise, social engagement, creative (even artistic) expression, phased retirement or part-time work, volunteering, learning new things over which one develops a feeling of growing mastery–these kinds of changes lead to surprisingly vital older people who live better and longer than their unlucky peers.

Cohen has some startling findings in his data that supports his views. One in particular is that aging brains contain expansive bundles of neurons not available to the young, bundles that reflect a lifetime of experience. At the same time these brain assets become more balanced between both hemispheres, doing with the whole brain what the young cannot yet do or can do only with Left or Right hemispheres singly.

Older people have a “developmental intelligence” which better balances physical and emotional maturity. Development is wrongly seen as just for kids. The maturing brain is more capable of what Cohen calls “relativistic thinking” (not black and white), “dualistic thinking” (resolving opposites), and “systematic thinking” (big picture). These capabilities give the mature mind truly “advanced” status. It can take a lifetime to develop the basis for these advances, and they have enormous individual and social implications.

So, this book is more than a useful guide to saving one’s own aging brain. It is also a review laying a basis for social, even political changes, reflecting the untapped potential of our aging American population.

2007 David M. Wolf,

Hope I die before I get old

Contrary to stereotypes, this study finds that older people tend to be happier than younger people:
==========================================
From:
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2006-06/uomh-hid061206.php

Hope I die before I get old?
Study finds attitudes about aging contradict reality

ANN ARBOR, Mich. — Back when he was 20 years old in 1965, rock star Pete Townshend wrote the line “I hope I die before I get old” into a song, “My Generation” that launched his band, the Who, onto the rock ‘n’ roll scene.

But a unique new study suggests that Townshend may have fallen victim to a common, and mistaken, belief: That the happiest days of people’s lives occur when they’re young.

In fact, the study finds, both young people and older people think that young people are happier than older people — when in fact research has shown the opposite. And while both older and younger adults tend to equate old age with unhappiness for other people, individuals tend to think they’ll be happier than most in their old age.

In other words, the young Pete Townshend may have thought others of his generation would be miserable in old age. And now that he’s 61, he might look back and think he himself was happier back then. But the opposite is likely to be true: Older people “mis-remember” how happy they were as youths, just as youths “mis-predict” how happy (or unhappy) they will be as they age.

The study, performed by VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System and University of Michigan researchers, involved more than 540 adults who were either between the ages of 21 and 40, or over age 60. All were asked to rate or predict their own individual happiness at their current age, at age 30 and at age 70, and also to judge how happy most people are at those ages. The results are published in the June issue of the Journal of Happiness Studies, a major research journal in the field of positive psychology.

“Overall, people got it wrong, believing that most people become less happy as they age, when in fact this study and others have shown that people tend to become happier over time,” says lead author Heather Lacey, Ph.D., a VA postdoctoral fellow and member of the U-M Medical School’s Center for Behavioral and Decision Sciences in Medicine. “Not only do younger people believe that older people are less happy, but older people believe they and others must have been happier ‘back then’. Neither belief is accurate.”

The findings have implications for understanding young people’s decisions about habits — such as smoking or saving money — that might affect their health or finances later in life. They also may help explain the fear of aging that drives middle-aged people to “midlife crisis” behavior in a vain attempt to slow their own aging.

Stereotypes about aging abound in our society, Lacey says, and affect the way older people are treated as well as the public policies that affect them.

That’s why research on the beliefs that fuel those one-size-fits-all depictions of older people is important, she explains. The study is one of the first ever to examine the ability of individuals to remember or predict happiness over the lifespan. Most studies of happiness have focused on people with chronic illness, disabilities or other major life challenges, or have taken “snapshots” of current happiness among older people.

The senior author of the new paper, Peter Ubel, M.D., has conducted several of these studies, and has found that ill people are often surprisingly happy, sometimes just as happy as healthy people. This suggests an adaptability or resilience in the face of their medical problems. Ubel is the director of the Center for Behavioral and Decision Sciences in Medicine, an advisor to the RWJ Clinical Scholars Program, and author of You’re Stronger Than You Think: Tapping the Secrets of Emotionally Resilient People (McGraw-Hill, 2006).

“People often believe that happiness is a matter of circumstance, that if something good happens, they will experience long-lasting happiness, or if something bad happens, they will experience long-term misery,” he says. “But instead, people’s happiness results more from their underlying emotional resources — resources that appear to grow with age. People get better at managing life’s ups and downs, and the result is that as they age, they become happier — even though their objective circumstances, such as their health, decline.”

Lacey adds, “It’s not that people overestimate their happiness, but rather that they learn how to value life from adversities like being sick. What the sick learn from being sick, the rest of us come to over time.” The new study, she explains, sprang from a desire to see whether the experience that comes with advancing age affects attitudes and predictions about aging.

The study was done using an online survey with six questions, asked in four different orders to reduce bias. The participants were part of large group of individuals who had previously volunteered to take online surveys, and chose to respond to the U-M/VA inquiry. The two age groups were about equally divided between men and women. About 35 percent of the younger group’s members were from ethnic minority groups, compared with 24 percent of the older group’s members.

Each participant was asked to rate his or her own current level of happiness on a scale of 1 to 10, and also to rate on that same scale how happy an average person of their age would be. Each participant was also asked to remember or predict (depending on their age) their level of happiness at age 30 and at age 70, again on a scale of 1 to 10. They were also asked to guess the happiness of the average person at each of those ages.

To make sure that their online survey methodology didn’t skew the results by including an atypical group of older people, the researchers compare the older group’s happiness self-ratings with those from self-ratings collected in other ways from people of the same age range. They matched.

In all, a statistical analysis of the results show, people in the older group reported a current level of happiness for themselves that was significantly higher than the self-rating made by the younger group’s members. And yet, participants of all ages thought that the average 30-year-old would be happier than the average 70-year-old, and that happiness would decline with age.

Interestingly, the younger people in the study predicted that they themselves would be about as happy at age 70 as they were in younger years, though they said that others their own age would probably get less happy over time. And the older people in the study tended to think that they’d be happier at older ages than other people would be.

This tendency to think of oneself as “above average” has been seen in other studies of everything from driving ability to intelligence, Lacey says. This bias may combine with negative attitudes about aging to help explain the study’s findings, she notes.

Further analysis of the study data will examine the impact of individuals’ core beliefs on their predictions and memory of happiness.

Since completing the study, the researchers have gone back to study people between the ages of 40 and 60, and hope to present those data soon. They also plan to study how beliefs about happiness in young and old age influence people’s retirement planning and health care decision making.

###

In addition to Lacey and Ubel, the study was co-authored by Dylan Smith, Ph.D., a research investigator at the CDBSM. The center’s web site is www.cbdsm.org. The study was funded by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, and by the Department of Veterans Affairs. Reference: Journal of Happiness Studies, June 2006 Vol 7, Issue 2.